↓ Skip to main content

Impact of Race on Immunization Status in Long-Term Care Facilities

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
Title
Impact of Race on Immunization Status in Long-Term Care Facilities
Published in
Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities, July 2018
DOI 10.1007/s40615-018-0510-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stacey C. Barrett, Stephen Schmaltz, Nancy Kupka, Kenneth A. Rasinski

Abstract

This study examined the relationship between resident race and immunization status in long-term care facilities (LTCFs). Race was captured at the resident and the facility racial composition level. Thirty-six long-term care facilities varying in racial composition and size were selected for site visits. LTCFs were urban and rural, CMS certified, and non-hospital administered. Chart abstraction was used to determine race, immunization, and refusal status for the 2010-2011 flu season (influenza 1), the 2011-2012 flu season (influenza 2), and the pneumococcal pneumonia vaccine for all residents over 65 years old. Thirty-five LTCFs submitted sufficient data for inclusion, and 2570 resident records were reviewed. Overall immunization rates were 70.5% for influenza 1, 74.1% for influenza 2, and 65.6% for pneumococcal pneumonia. Random effects logistic regression indicated that as the percent of Black residents increased, the immunization rate significantly decreased (immunization 1, p < 0.018, immunization 2, p < 0.002, pneumococcal pneumonia, p = 0.0059), independent of the effect of resident race which had less of an impact on rates. This study found considerable LTCF variation and racial disparities in immunization rates. Compared to Blacks, Whites were vaccinated at higher rates regardless of the LTCF racial composition. Facilities with a greater proportion of Black residents had lower immunization rates than those with primarily White residents. Facility racial mix is a stronger predictor of influenza immunization than resident race. Black residents had significantly higher vaccination refusal rates than White residents for immunization 2. Further studies examining LTCF-level factors that affect racial disparities in immunizations in LTCFs are needed.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 21 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 10%
Student > Master 2 10%
Librarian 1 5%
Researcher 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 12 57%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 19%
Social Sciences 4 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 10%
Unknown 11 52%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 July 2018.
All research outputs
#5,830,887
of 23,094,276 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities
#472
of 1,027 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#99,385
of 326,948 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities
#12
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,094,276 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,027 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.5. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,948 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.