↓ Skip to main content

Microbial Community Level Physiological Profiles of Active Mud Volcano Soils in Andaman and Nicobar Islands

Overview of attention for article published in National Academy Science Letters, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
Title
Microbial Community Level Physiological Profiles of Active Mud Volcano Soils in Andaman and Nicobar Islands
Published in
National Academy Science Letters, July 2018
DOI 10.1007/s40009-018-0632-3
Authors

N. Amaresan, Krishna Kumar, G. Venkadesaperumal, N. Ch. Srivathsa

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 2 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 14%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 14%
Unknown 2 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 29%
Environmental Science 1 14%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 14%
Unknown 2 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 July 2018.
All research outputs
#5,830,887
of 23,096,849 outputs
Outputs from National Academy Science Letters
#5
of 57 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#99,655
of 327,720 outputs
Outputs of similar age from National Academy Science Letters
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,096,849 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 57 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,720 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them