↓ Skip to main content

Retrospective Evaluation of Nicardipine Versus Labetalol for Blood Pressure Control in Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage

Overview of attention for article published in Neurocritical Care, April 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
Title
Retrospective Evaluation of Nicardipine Versus Labetalol for Blood Pressure Control in Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage
Published in
Neurocritical Care, April 2012
DOI 10.1007/s12028-012-9700-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Amanda V. Woloszyn, Karen J. McAllen, Bryan E. Figueroa, Robert S. DeShane, Jeffrey F. Barletta

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 42 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 10 23%
Researcher 7 16%
Student > Master 5 11%
Student > Bachelor 4 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Other 11 25%
Unknown 4 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 64%
Neuroscience 6 14%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Unknown 7 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 September 2015.
All research outputs
#15,346,908
of 22,828,180 outputs
Outputs from Neurocritical Care
#1,094
of 1,494 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#103,368
of 162,100 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neurocritical Care
#7
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,828,180 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,494 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 162,100 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.