You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Association of current and former smoking with body mass index: A study of smoking discordant twin pairs from 21 twin cohorts
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, July 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0200140 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Maarit Piirtola, Aline Jelenkovic, Antti Latvala, Reijo Sund, Chika Honda, Fujio Inui, Mikio Watanabe, Rie Tomizawa, Yoshinori Iwatani, Juan R. Ordoñana, Juan F. Sánchez-Romera, Lucia Colodro-Conde, Adam D. Tarnoki, David L. Tarnoki, Nicholas G. Martin, Grant W. Montgomery, Sarah E. Medland, Finn Rasmussen, Per Tynelius, Qihua Tan, Dongfeng Zhang, Zengchang Pang, Esther Rebato, Maria A. Stazi, Corrado Fagnani, Sonia Brescianini, Andreas Busjahn, Jennifer R. Harris, Ingunn Brandt, Thomas Sevenius Nilsen, Tessa L. Cutler, John L. Hopper, Robin P. Corley, Brooke M. Huibregtse, Joohon Sung, Jina Kim, Jooyeon Lee, Sooji Lee, Margaret Gatz, David A. Butler, Carol E. Franz, William S. Kremen, Michael J. Lyons, Patrik K. E. Magnusson, Nancy L. Pedersen, Anna K. Dahl Aslan, Sevgi Y. Öncel, Fazil Aliev, Catherine A. Derom, Robert F. Vlietinck, Ruth J. F. Loos, Judy L. Silberg, Hermine H. Maes, Dorret I. Boomsma, Thorkild I. A. Sørensen, Tellervo Korhonen, Jaakko Kaprio, Karri Silventoinen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Finland | 3 | 23% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 15% |
| United States | 1 | 8% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 8% |
| Denmark | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 5 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 46% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 23% |
| Scientists | 3 | 23% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 160 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 160 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 13% |
| Researcher | 16 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 28 | 18% |
| Unknown | 65 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 32 | 20% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 12 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 3% |
| Psychology | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 21 | 13% |
| Unknown | 71 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 June 2022.
All research outputs
#4,792,785
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#83,525
of 225,486 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#83,329
of 342,377 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#927
of 3,270 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 225,486 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,377 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,270 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.