| Title |
The ecology of environmental DNA and implications for conservation genetics
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Conservation Genetics, September 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10592-015-0775-4 |
| Authors |
Matthew A. Barnes, Cameron R. Turner |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 78 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 10 | 13% |
| United Kingdom | 8 | 10% |
| Canada | 7 | 9% |
| Australia | 5 | 6% |
| Ireland | 3 | 4% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 1% |
| Denmark | 1 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Unknown | 35 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 43 | 55% |
| Scientists | 32 | 41% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,550 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | <1% |
| Portugal | 2 | <1% |
| Australia | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 2 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 1532 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 262 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 245 | 16% |
| Researcher | 235 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 235 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 59 | 4% |
| Other | 183 | 12% |
| Unknown | 331 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 562 | 36% |
| Environmental Science | 289 | 19% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 204 | 13% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 29 | 2% |
| Engineering | 26 | 2% |
| Other | 67 | 4% |
| Unknown | 373 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 117. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 February 2024.
All research outputs
#363,409
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Genetics
#8
of 1,171 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,574
of 281,751 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Genetics
#1
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,171 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 281,751 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.