↓ Skip to main content

Mutations in Known Monogenic High Bone Mass Loci Only Explain a Small Proportion of High Bone Mass Cases

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Bone & Mineral Research, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mutations in Known Monogenic High Bone Mass Loci Only Explain a Small Proportion of High Bone Mass Cases
Published in
Journal of Bone & Mineral Research, September 2015
DOI 10.1002/jbmr.2706
Pubmed ID
Authors

Celia L Gregson, Lawrie Wheeler, Sarah A Hardcastle, Louise H Appleton, Kathryn A Addison, Marieke Brugmans, Graeme R Clark, Kate A Ward, Margaret Paggiosi, Mike Stone, Joegi Thomas, Rohan Agarwal, Kenneth ES Poole, Eugene McCloskey, William D Fraser, Eleanor Williams, Alex N Bullock, George Davey Smith, Matthew A Brown, Jon H Tobias, Emma L Duncan

Abstract

High bone mass (HBM) can be an incidental clinical finding; however, monogenic HBM disorders (e.g. LRP5 or SOST mutations) are rare. We aimed to determine to what extent HBM is explained by mutations in known HBM genes. 258 unrelated HBM cases were identified from review of 335,115 DXA scans from 13 UK centers. Cases were assessed clinically and underwent sequencing of known anabolic HBM loci: LRP5 (exons 2, 3, 4), LRP4 (exons 25, 26), SOST (exons 1, 2, and the van Buchem's disease (VBD) 52kb intronic deletion 3'). Family members were assessed for HBM segregation with identified variants. Three-dimensional protein models were constructed for identified variants. Two novel missense LRP5 HBM mutations ([c.518C > T; p.Thr173Met], [c.796C > T; p.Arg266Cys]) were identified, plus three previously reported missense LRP5 mutations ([c.593A > G; p.Asn198Ser], [c.724G > A; p.Ala242Thr], [c.266A > G; p.Gln89Arg]), associated with HBM in 11 adults from seven families. Individuals with LRP5 HBM (∼prevalence 5/100,000) displayed a variable phenotype of skeletal dysplasia with increased trabecular BMD and cortical thickness on HRpQCT, and gynoid fat mass accumulation on DXA, compared with both non-LRP5 HBM and controls. One mostly asymptomatic woman carried a novel heterozygous nonsense SOST mutation (c.530C > A; p.Ser177X) predicted to prematurely truncate sclerostin. Protein modelling suggests the severity of the LRP5-HBM phenotype corresponds to the degree of protein disruption and the consequent effect on SOST-LRP5 binding. We predict p.Asn198Ser and p.Ala242Thr directly disrupt SOST binding; both correspond to severe HBM phenotypes (BMD Z-scores +3.1 to +12.2, inability to float). Less disruptive structural alterations predicted from p.Arg266Cys, p.Thr173Met, p.Gln89Arg were associated with less severe phenotypes (Z-scores +2.4 to +6.2, ability to float). In conclusion, although mutations in known HBM loci may be asymptomatic, they only account for a very small proportion (∼3%) of HBM individuals, suggesting the great majority are explained by either unknown monogenic causes or polygenic inheritance. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 40 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 5 13%
Professor 4 10%
Student > Master 3 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 8%
Other 2 5%
Other 6 15%
Unknown 17 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 23%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 15%
Sports and Recreations 3 8%
Computer Science 1 3%
Psychology 1 3%
Other 5 13%
Unknown 15 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 September 2015.
All research outputs
#15,884,096
of 25,593,129 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Bone & Mineral Research
#3,757
of 4,802 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#144,182
of 280,307 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Bone & Mineral Research
#21
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,593,129 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,802 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,307 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.