↓ Skip to main content

Office‐based Core Needle Biopsy of Bone and Soft Tissue Malignancies: An Accurate Alternative to Open Biopsy with Infrequent Complications

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, June 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
67 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
61 Mendeley
Title
Office‐based Core Needle Biopsy of Bone and Soft Tissue Malignancies: An Accurate Alternative to Open Biopsy with Infrequent Complications
Published in
Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, June 2010
DOI 10.1007/s11999-010-1422-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sheila C. Adams, Benjamin K. Potter, David J. Pitcher, Thomas H. Temple

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Ukraine 1 2%
Unknown 60 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 13%
Student > Master 7 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 11%
Student > Bachelor 5 8%
Other 4 7%
Other 16 26%
Unknown 14 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 38 62%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Psychology 1 2%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Social Sciences 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 17 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 September 2015.
All research outputs
#3,415,350
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#663
of 7,298 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,066
of 104,305 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#7
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,298 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 104,305 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.