↓ Skip to main content

Opportunistic management of estuaries under climate change: A new adaptive decision-making framework and its practical application

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Environmental Management, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
166 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Opportunistic management of estuaries under climate change: A new adaptive decision-making framework and its practical application
Published in
Journal of Environmental Management, August 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.08.021
Pubmed ID
Authors

William Peirson, Erica Davey, Alan Jones, Wade Hadwen, Keith Bishop, Maria Beger, Samantha Capon, Peter Fairweather, Bob Creese, Timothy F. Smith, Leigh Gray, Rodger Tomlinson

Abstract

Ongoing coastal development and the prospect of severe climate change impacts present pressing estuary management and governance challenges. Robust approaches must recognise the intertwined social and ecological vulnerabilities of estuaries. Here, a new governance and management framework is proposed that recognises the integrated social-ecological systems of estuaries so as to permit transformative adaptation to climate change within these systems. The framework lists stakeholders and identifies estuarine uses and values. Goals are categorised that are specific to ecosystems, private property, public infrastructure, and human communities. Systematic adaptation management strategies are proposed with conceptual examples and associated governance approaches. Contrasting case studies are used to illustrate the practical application of these ideas. The framework will assist estuary managers worldwide to achieve their goals, minimise maladaptative responses, better identify competing interests, reduce stakeholder conflict and exploit opportunities for appropriate ecosystem restoration and sustainable development.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 166 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 2 1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 161 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 19%
Researcher 28 17%
Student > Master 20 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 6%
Student > Bachelor 7 4%
Other 21 13%
Unknown 48 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 35 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 25 15%
Social Sciences 15 9%
Engineering 7 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 5 3%
Other 27 16%
Unknown 52 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 June 2016.
All research outputs
#16,048,009
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Environmental Management
#3,623
of 6,438 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#148,939
of 279,606 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Environmental Management
#26
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,438 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,606 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.