↓ Skip to main content

Feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of a technology‐assisted psychosocial intervention for racially diverse men with advanced prostate cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer (0008543X), September 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
75 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
293 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of a technology‐assisted psychosocial intervention for racially diverse men with advanced prostate cancer
Published in
Cancer (0008543X), September 2015
DOI 10.1002/cncr.29658
Pubmed ID
Authors

Betina Yanez, Heather L. McGinty, David C. Mohr, Mark J. Begale, Jason R. Dahn, Sarah C. Flury, Kent T. Perry, Frank J. Penedo

Abstract

The utility of psychosocial interventions in reducing symptom burden and improving health-related quality of life (HRQOL) for men with localized prostate cancer has been demonstrated. However, studies have yet to demonstrate the efficacy of interventions in advanced prostate cancer (APC). This study examined the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of a technology-assisted, 10-week, group-based psychosocial intervention for diverse men with APC. The participants were 74 men (mean age, 68.84 years; non-Hispanic white, 57%; black, 40.5%) who were randomized to a cognitive-behavioral stress management (CBSM) treatment or health promotion (HP) attention-control condition. The participants were assessed at the baseline, weekly throughout the 10-week program, and 6 months after the baseline. Outcomes were assessed with the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System along with established measures of HRQOL, CBSM intervention targets (eg, relaxation skills), and patient-reported acceptability. Feasibility was demonstrated through good retention rates (>85%) and acceptable average attendance rates (>70%), and acceptability was demonstrated through very favorable weekly session evaluations (mean score, 4/5) and exit surveys (mean score, 3.6/4). Men randomized to the CBSM condition reported significant reductions (P < .05) in depressive symptoms and improvements in relaxation self-efficacy (P < .05) at the 6-month follow-up. CBSM participants reported trends for improvement in distress and functional well-being (P < .08) in comparison with those in the HP condition. Effect sizes ranged from medium (0.54) to large (1.87) and, in some instances, were clinically meaningful. Technology-based CBSM interventions among diverse men with APC may be feasible, acceptable, and efficacious. Cancer 2015. © 2015 American Cancer Society.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 293 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Unknown 291 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 45 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 40 14%
Researcher 30 10%
Student > Bachelor 28 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 20 7%
Other 43 15%
Unknown 87 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 60 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 45 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 31 11%
Social Sciences 14 5%
Computer Science 7 2%
Other 43 15%
Unknown 93 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 May 2016.
All research outputs
#8,483,362
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Cancer (0008543X)
#6,470
of 14,100 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#95,327
of 279,977 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer (0008543X)
#74
of 135 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,100 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,977 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 135 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.