↓ Skip to main content

Preoperative Coronary Anatomy Assessment with Echocardiography and Morbidity After Arterial Switch Operation of Transposition of the Great Arteries

Overview of attention for article published in Pediatric Cardiology, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
Title
Preoperative Coronary Anatomy Assessment with Echocardiography and Morbidity After Arterial Switch Operation of Transposition of the Great Arteries
Published in
Pediatric Cardiology, July 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00246-018-1939-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Love Ahlström, Michal Odermarsky, Torsten Malm, Jens Johansson Ramgren, Petru Liuba

Abstract

In transposition of the great arteries (TGA), certain coronary patterns have been associated with major adverse events early after the arterial switch operation (ASO). We sought to determine the impact of preoperative echocardiographic (ECHO) diagnosis on the intra- and postoperative morbidity. All patients with TGA born between June 2001 and June 2017 and who underwent ASO were reviewed. Data on presumed coronary anatomy (CA) preoperatively were obtained from the preoperative ECHO report. Intraoperative CA was categorized according to Yacoub classification. Major postoperative morbidity included at least one of the following: delayed sternal closure (DSC), prolonged (> 72 h) mechanical ventilation, reintubation, peritoneal dialysis (PD), ECMO, reoperation, and readmission within 30 days after surgery. 240 patients with median age of 5 days (range 1-614) and mean weight at surgery was 3.6 kg (1.8-8.4) were included. Preoperative ECHO assessment of CA was available in 228 patients. Intraoperatively, 181 patients (75%) were found to have type A, 25 patients had type B or C or intramural (B-C-IM; 10%), and 34 patients had type D or E (D-E; 14%). Patients with types B, C, and intramural coronary (B-C-IM) had increased risk for delayed sternum closure (9/25 vs. 20/181 in type A and 8/34 in type D-E; p = 0.04), peritoneal dialysis (4/25 vs. 8/181 and 1/34; p = 0.04), and ECMO (2/25 vs. 1/131 and 1/34; p = 0.02). Within the B-C-IM group, preoperative ECHO raised suspicion of type A in 13 patients (i.e., incorrect diagnosis, ID; 52%), whereas non-A CA was suspected in 12 patients (i.e., correct diagnosis, CD; 48%). With the exception of reoperation, which was seen only in the ID subgroup (4/12 vs. 0/10 in the CD subgroup; p = 0.04), the intraoperative (cardiopulmonary bypass time and cross-clamp time) and postoperative morbidity indices were comparable in both ID and CD subgroups (p > 0.1). Although there is a significant risk for early postoperative morbidity in TGA patients with single, interarterial, and intramural CA, there seems to be relatively limited influence of preoperative ECHO assessment of coronary anatomy on this morbidity burden.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 31 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 26%
Other 3 10%
Student > Master 3 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Student > Postgraduate 2 6%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 11 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 35%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Physics and Astronomy 1 3%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 13 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 April 2020.
All research outputs
#14,046,056
of 24,494,826 outputs
Outputs from Pediatric Cardiology
#524
of 1,492 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#163,292
of 331,268 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pediatric Cardiology
#7
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,494,826 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,492 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,268 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.