↓ Skip to main content

Academic Integrity in a Mandatory Physics Lab: The Influence of Post-Graduate Aspirations and Grade Point Averages

Overview of attention for article published in Science and Engineering Ethics, November 2011
Altmetric Badge

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
Title
Academic Integrity in a Mandatory Physics Lab: The Influence of Post-Graduate Aspirations and Grade Point Averages
Published in
Science and Engineering Ethics, November 2011
DOI 10.1007/s11948-011-9325-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tricia Bertram Gallant, Michael G. Anderson, Christine Killoran

Abstract

Research on academic cheating by high school students and undergraduates suggests that many students will do whatever it takes, including violating ethical classroom standards, to not be left behind or to race to the top. This behavior may be exacerbated among pre-med and pre-health professional school students enrolled in laboratory classes because of the typical disconnect between these students, their instructors and the perceived legitimacy of the laboratory work. There is little research, however, that has investigated the relationship between high aspirations and academic conduct. This study fills this research gap by investigating the beliefs, perceptions and self-reported academic conduct of highly aspirational students and their peers in mandatory physics labs. The findings suggest that physics laboratory classes may face particular challenges with highly aspirational students and cheating, but the paper offers practical solutions for addressing them.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 3%
United States 1 3%
Unknown 38 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 10%
Lecturer 4 10%
Student > Bachelor 4 10%
Student > Master 3 8%
Researcher 3 8%
Other 9 23%
Unknown 13 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 7 18%
Psychology 5 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 10%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 8%
Physics and Astronomy 2 5%
Other 7 18%
Unknown 12 30%