↓ Skip to main content

Magnetic resonance imaging surrogates of molecular subgroups in atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumor

Overview of attention for article published in Neuro-Oncology, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Magnetic resonance imaging surrogates of molecular subgroups in atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumor
Published in
Neuro-Oncology, July 2018
DOI 10.1093/neuonc/noy111
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Recently, three molecular subgroups of atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumor (ATRT) were identified, but little is known on their clinical and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) characteristics. A total of 43 patients with known molecular subgroup status (ATRT-SHH n=17, ATRT-TYR n=16, ATRT-MYC n=10) were retrieved from the EU-RHAB registry and analyzed for clinical and MRI features. On MRI review, differences in preferential tumor location were confirmed, with ATRT-TYR being predominantly located infratentorially (p<.05). Peritumoral edema was more pronounced in ATRT-MYC, compared to ATRT-SHH (p<.05) and ATRT-TYR (p<.05). Conversely, peripheral tumor cysts were found more frequently in ATRT-SHH (71%) and ATRT-TYR (94%), as compared to ATRT-MYC (40%, p<.05). Contrast enhancement was absent in 29% of ATRT-SHH (0% of ATRT-TYR; 10% of ATRT-MYC; p<.05), and there was a trend towards strong contrast enhancement in ATRT-TYR and ATRT-MYC. We found the characteristic (band-like) enhancement in 28% of ATRT as well as restricted diffusion in the majority of tumors. A midline/off-midline location in the posterior fossa was also not subgroup-specific. Visible meningeal spread (M2) at diagnosis was rare throughout all subgroups. These exploratory findings suggest that MRI features vary across the three molecular subgroups of ATRT. Within future prospective trials, MRI may aid diagnosis and treatment stratification.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 43 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 5 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 12%
Student > Bachelor 4 9%
Student > Postgraduate 4 9%
Professor 3 7%
Other 9 21%
Unknown 13 30%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 49%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Social Sciences 1 2%
Neuroscience 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 14 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2018.
All research outputs
#17,982,872
of 23,096,849 outputs
Outputs from Neuro-Oncology
#2,281
of 3,271 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#236,171
of 327,048 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuro-Oncology
#30
of 87 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,096,849 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,271 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,048 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 87 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.