| Title |
Azolla: Botany, physiology, and use as a green manure
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Economic Botany, April 1980
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf02858627 |
| Authors |
Thomas A. Lumpkin, Donald L. Plucknett |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 171 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 166 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 35 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 11% |
| Researcher | 13 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 10 | 6% |
| Other | 23 | 13% |
| Unknown | 54 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 63 | 37% |
| Environmental Science | 19 | 11% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 13 | 8% |
| Chemistry | 4 | 2% |
| Engineering | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 18 | 11% |
| Unknown | 50 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 December 2020.
All research outputs
#2,746,936
of 23,096,849 outputs
Outputs from Economic Botany
#81
of 850 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#259
of 6,545 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Economic Botany
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,096,849 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 850 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 6,545 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them