You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
A review on hybrid nanolaminate materials synthesized by deposition techniques for energy storage applications
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Materials Chemistry, January 2014
|
DOI | 10.1039/c3ta14034b |
Authors |
Jalal Azadmanjiri, Christopher C. Berndt, James Wang, Ajay Kapoor, Vijay K. Srivastava, Cuie Wen |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 163 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Poland | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 162 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 47 | 29% |
Researcher | 21 | 13% |
Student > Master | 10 | 6% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 5% |
Student > Bachelor | 7 | 4% |
Other | 14 | 9% |
Unknown | 56 | 34% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Materials Science | 35 | 21% |
Chemistry | 22 | 13% |
Engineering | 16 | 10% |
Physics and Astronomy | 13 | 8% |
Chemical Engineering | 6 | 4% |
Other | 5 | 3% |
Unknown | 66 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 June 2019.
All research outputs
#8,693,470
of 25,756,911 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Materials Chemistry
#4,576
of 19,298 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#97,544
of 321,307 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Materials Chemistry
#155
of 494 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,756,911 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 19,298 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 321,307 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 494 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.