Title |
SPOP promotes ATF2 ubiquitination and degradation to suppress prostate cancer progression
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research, July 2018
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13046-018-0809-0 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jian Ma, Kun Chang, Jingtao Peng, Qing Shi, Hualei Gan, Kun Gao, Kai Feng, Fujiang Xu, Hailiang Zhang, Bo Dai, Yao Zhu, Guohai Shi, Yijun Shen, Yiping Zhu, Xiaojian Qin, Yao Li, Pingzhao Zhang, Dingwei Ye, Chenji Wang |
Abstract |
Next-generation sequencing of the exome and genome of prostate cancers has identified numerous genetic alterations. SPOP (Speckle-type POZ Protein) is one of the most frequently mutated genes in primary prostate cancer, suggesting that SPOP may be a potential driver of prostate cancer. The aim of this work was to investigate how SPOP mutations contribute to prostate cancer development and progression. To identify molecular mediators of the tumor suppressive function of SPOP, we performed a yeast two-hybrid screen in a HeLa cDNA library using the full-length SPOP as bait. Immunoprecipitation and Western Blotting were used to analyze the interaction between SPOP and ATF2. Cell migration and invasion were determined by Transwell assays. Immunohistochemistry were used to analyze protein levels in patients' tumor samples. Here we identified ATF2 as a bona fide substrate of the SPOP-CUL3-RBX1 E3 ubiquitin ligase complex. SPOP recognizes multiple Ser/Thr (S/T)-rich degrons in ATF2 and triggers ATF2 degradation via the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway. Strikingly, prostate cancer-associated mutants of SPOP are defective in promoting ATF2 degradation in prostate cancer cells and contribute to facilitating prostate cancer cell proliferation, migration and invasion. SPOP promotes ATF2 ubiquitination and degradation, and ATF2 is an important mediator of SPOP inactivation-induced cell proliferation, migration and invasion. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Italy | 1 | 25% |
Switzerland | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 25% |
Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 27 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 5 | 19% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 15% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 11% |
Student > Master | 3 | 11% |
Other | 2 | 7% |
Other | 5 | 19% |
Unknown | 5 | 19% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 13 | 48% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 11% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 7% |
Computer Science | 1 | 4% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 4% |
Other | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 6 | 22% |