↓ Skip to main content

Impact of Nesiritide Infusion on Early Postoperative Recovery After Total Cavopulmonary Connection Surgery

Overview of attention for article published in Pediatric Cardiology, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
Title
Impact of Nesiritide Infusion on Early Postoperative Recovery After Total Cavopulmonary Connection Surgery
Published in
Pediatric Cardiology, July 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00246-018-1935-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yajuan Zhang, Yabing Duan, Jun Yan, Qiang Wang, Shoujun Li, Haitao Xu

Abstract

The purpose of the study is to compare the effects of nesiritide on the discharge time and pleural effusion in children with total cavopulmonary connection (TCPC), and to provide a more reasonable clinical method for these children. Forty-four who children underwent cavopulmonary connection between January 2016 and 2017 were retrospectively collected, and 5 children were excluded from analysis due to postoperative thrombosis or second Fontan surgery due to high pulmonary hypertension. Thirteen children received nesiritide (3-11 days) plus conventional treatment as the nesiritide group, continuous infusion of nesiritide with the dose of 0.01 ug kg-1 min-1. Twenty-six children with the conventional treatment as the conventional treatment group. The length of stay in hospital and the retention time of chest drainage tube were compared between two groups. There were no significant differences in the time of cardiopulmonary bypass, postoperative ventilation time, ICU time, and vasoactive inotropic drug scores in the two groups. There were no hospital deaths in two groups. The median hospital stay was 20 days in the nesiritide group (11-56 days, means 25 days), and the median length of hospital stay was 28 days in the routine treatment group (9-95 days, means 34 days). There is no statistically significant difference between two groups with regard to the length of stay in hospital (P = 0.281). Regarding the thoracic drainage duration, the median was 17 days (9-55 days, means 22 days) in the nesiritide group and 23 days in the conventional treatment group (7-91 days, means 31 days) (P = 0.294). All the patients had no severe complications such as excessive fluid load, intractable hypotension, and liver or kidney injury. Nesiritide is safe in children who underwent cavopulmonary connection surgery. Compared with the conventional treatment group, postoperative nesiritide is not associated with improved early clinical outcomes after TCPC surgery.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 14 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 21%
Student > Bachelor 2 14%
Other 1 7%
Librarian 1 7%
Unspecified 1 7%
Other 4 29%
Unknown 2 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 50%
Computer Science 1 7%
Unspecified 1 7%
Materials Science 1 7%
Psychology 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 July 2018.
All research outputs
#20,527,576
of 23,096,849 outputs
Outputs from Pediatric Cardiology
#1,106
of 1,418 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#286,370
of 326,948 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pediatric Cardiology
#27
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,096,849 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,418 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,948 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.