↓ Skip to main content

Brain response to food brands correlates with increased intake from branded meals in children: an fMRI study

Overview of attention for article published in Brain Imaging and Behavior, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
9 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
72 Mendeley
Title
Brain response to food brands correlates with increased intake from branded meals in children: an fMRI study
Published in
Brain Imaging and Behavior, July 2018
DOI 10.1007/s11682-018-9919-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Travis D. Masterson, Wendy M. Stein, Emma Beidler, Maria Bermudez, Laural K. English, Kathleen L. Keller

Abstract

Food branding is ubiquitous, however, not all children are equally susceptible to its effects. The objectives of this study were to 1) determine whether food brands evoke differential response than non-food brands in brain areas related to motivation and inhibitory control using blood oxygen level dependent (BOLD) functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and 2) determine the association between brain response and energy intake at test-meals presented with or without brands. Twenty-eight 7-10 year-old children completed four visits as part of a within-subjects design where they consumed three multi-item test-meals presented with familiar food brands, novel food brand, and no brand. On the fourth visit an fMRI was performed where children passively viewed food brands, non-food brands and control images. A whole-brain analysis was conducted to compare BOLD response between conditions. Pearson's correlations were calculated to determine the association between brain response and meal intake. Relative to non-food brands, food brand images were associated with increased activity in the right lingual gyrus. Relative to control, food and non-food brand images were associated with greater response in bilateral fusiform gyri and decreased response in the cuneus, precuneus, lingual gyrus, and supramarginal gyrus. Less activation in the bilateral fusiform gyrus to both food and non-food brands was associated with greater energy intake of the branded vs unbranded meal. These findings may help explain differences in the susceptibility to the intake-promoting effects of food advertising in children.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 72 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 10%
Student > Bachelor 7 10%
Researcher 6 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 8%
Other 12 17%
Unknown 28 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 10 14%
Neuroscience 6 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 8%
Social Sciences 4 6%
Other 7 10%
Unknown 33 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 July 2023.
All research outputs
#4,212,754
of 25,399,318 outputs
Outputs from Brain Imaging and Behavior
#226
of 1,182 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,487
of 341,343 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brain Imaging and Behavior
#9
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,399,318 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,182 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,343 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.