↓ Skip to main content

Impact of referral templates on the quality of referrals from primary to secondary care: a cluster randomised trial

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
129 Mendeley
Title
Impact of referral templates on the quality of referrals from primary to secondary care: a cluster randomised trial
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, August 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12913-015-1017-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Henrik Wåhlberg, Per Christian Valle, Siri Malm, Ann Ragnhild Broderstad

Abstract

The referral letter is an important document facilitating the transfer of care from a general practitioner (GP) to secondary care. Hospital doctors have often criticised the quality and content of referral letters, and the effectiveness of improvement efforts remains uncertain. A cluster randomised trial was conducted using referral templates for patients in four diagnostic groups: dyspepsia, suspected colorectal cancer, chest pain and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The GP surgery was the unit of randomisation. Of the 14 surgeries served by the University Hospital of North Norway Harstad, seven were randomised to the intervention group. Intervention GPs used referral templates soliciting core clinical information when initiating a new referral in one of the four clinical areas. Intermittent surgery visits by study personnel were also carried out. A total of 500 patients were included, with 281 in the intervention and 219 in the control arm. Referral quality scoring was performed by three blinded raters. Data were analysed using multi-level regression modelling. All analyses were conducted on intention-to-treat basis. In the final multilevel model, referrals in the intervention group scored 18 % higher (95 % CI (11 %, 25 %), p < 0.001) on the referral quality score than the control group. The model also showed that board certified GPs and GPs in larger surgeries produced referrals of significantly higher quality. In this study, the dissemination of referral templates coupled with intermittent surgery visits produced higher quality referrals. This trial has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov. The trial registration number is NCT01470963 .

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 129 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
Unknown 127 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 24 19%
Student > Bachelor 14 11%
Researcher 12 9%
Student > Postgraduate 10 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 5%
Other 23 18%
Unknown 40 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 45 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 16%
Psychology 6 5%
Social Sciences 3 2%
Computer Science 2 2%
Other 8 6%
Unknown 45 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 September 2015.
All research outputs
#3,987,186
of 22,828,180 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#1,800
of 7,637 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,310
of 266,764 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#24
of 149 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,828,180 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,637 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,764 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 149 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.