↓ Skip to main content

Challenges to the management of curable sexually transmitted infections

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Infectious Diseases, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
13 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
2 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
66 Mendeley
Title
Challenges to the management of curable sexually transmitted infections
Published in
BMC Infectious Diseases, December 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12879-015-1061-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marcus Y Chen, Sepehr N Tabrizi

Abstract

Each year, hundreds of millions of new cases of curable sexually transmitted infections (STIs) occur worldwide resulting in reproductive and other serious sequelae, as well as enhanced transmission of HIV. The clinical management and control of these STIs should include as a minimum access to services that provide timely and accurate diagnostic testing together with effective treatment. The provision of appropriate treatment is challenged by the development of increasing antimicrobial resistance, in particular with gonorrhoea and Mycoplasma genitalium infections, requiring new treatments and management algorithms. In addition, infections such as chlamydia, syphilis and trichomoniasis, which show few signs of resistance, are nevertheless highly prevalent and require better public health control measures. While these may be achievable in high income countries, they are still beyond the reach of many low and middle income countries, making substantial improvements in STI management and reductions in STI prevalence challenging.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 63 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 17%
Researcher 10 15%
Other 9 14%
Student > Postgraduate 7 11%
Student > Bachelor 5 8%
Other 12 18%
Unknown 12 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 32%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 9%
Arts and Humanities 4 6%
Chemistry 2 3%
Other 14 21%
Unknown 13 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2015.
All research outputs
#1,860,701
of 23,881,329 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
#498
of 7,931 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,386
of 392,865 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
#5
of 142 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,881,329 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,931 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 392,865 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 142 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.