You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Variation in local abundance and species richness of stream fishes in relation to dispersal barriers: implications for management and conservation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Freshwater Biology, July 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1365-2427.2011.02634.x |
| Authors |
KEITH H. NISLOW, MARK HUDY, BENJAMIN H. LETCHER, ERIC P. SMITH |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 216 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Slovenia | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 207 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 55 | 25% |
| Student > Master | 42 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 39 | 18% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 13 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 5% |
| Other | 28 | 13% |
| Unknown | 28 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 94 | 44% |
| Environmental Science | 58 | 27% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 5 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 1% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 10 | 5% |
| Unknown | 43 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 November 2011.
All research outputs
#20,656,820
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Freshwater Biology
#2,119
of 2,690 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#108,614
of 130,230 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Freshwater Biology
#11
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,690 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 130,230 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.