↓ Skip to main content

Biocathodic Nitrous Oxide Removal in Bioelectrochemical Systems

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Science & Technology, November 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
54 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
80 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Biocathodic Nitrous Oxide Removal in Bioelectrochemical Systems
Published in
Environmental Science & Technology, November 2011
DOI 10.1021/es202047x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joachim Desloover, Sebastià Puig, Bernardino Virdis, Peter Clauwaert, Pascal Boeckx, Willy Verstraete, Nico Boon

Abstract

Anthropogenic nitrous oxide (N(2)O) emissions represent up to 40% of the global N(2)O emission and are constantly increasing. Mitigation of these emissions is warranted since N(2)O is a strong greenhouse gas and important ozone-depleting compound. Until now, only physicochemical technologies have been applied to mitigate point sources of N(2)O, and no biological treatment technology has been developed so far. In this study, a bioelectrochemical system (BES) with an autotrophic denitrifying biocathode was considered for the removal of N(2)O. The high N(2)O removal rates obtained ranged between 0.76 and 1.83 kg N m(-3) net cathodic compartment (NCC) d(-1) and were proportional to the current production, resulting in cathodic coulombic efficiencies near 100%. Furthermore, our experiments suggested the active involvement of microorganisms as the catalyst for the reduction of N(2)O to N(2), and the optimal cathode potential ranged from -200 to 0 mV vs standard hydrogen electrode (SHE) in order to obtain high conversion rates. Successful operation of the system for more than 115 days with N(2)O as the sole cathodic electron acceptor strongly indicated that N(2)O respiration yielded enough energy to maintain the biological process. To our knowledge, this study provides for the first time proof of concept of biocathodic N(2)O removal at long-term without the need for high temperatures and expensive catalysts.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Belgium 2 3%
Spain 2 3%
France 1 1%
Denmark 1 1%
India 1 1%
China 1 1%
Japan 1 1%
Unknown 71 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 36%
Researcher 15 19%
Student > Master 10 13%
Other 4 5%
Student > Bachelor 4 5%
Other 14 18%
Unknown 4 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 23 29%
Engineering 19 24%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 4%
Other 10 13%
Unknown 10 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 June 2014.
All research outputs
#7,486,435
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Science & Technology
#8,753
of 21,029 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,823
of 247,224 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Science & Technology
#62
of 171 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 21,029 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 247,224 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 171 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.