↓ Skip to main content

Implementing a hospital-wide protocol for Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
Title
Implementing a hospital-wide protocol for Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia
Published in
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, May 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10096-018-3284-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

K. Bolhuis, L. J. Bakker, J. T. Keijer, P. J. de Vries

Abstract

Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia (SAB) is associated with high-mortality and complication rates. A multidisciplinary approach is needed to predict, detect and treat complications. In this pre- and post-intervention study, we investigated the effects of a hospital-wide protocol for diagnosis, classification and treatment of SAB. It was hypothesized that complications and endocarditis would be better identified and treated. Medical records of SAB patients admitted in 2011 and 2012 (pre) were analysed. In 2013, a protocol, describing risk factors, diagnostic classification and recommended treatment, was implemented. In 2014 and 2015 (post), SAB patients were followed prospectively. Transthoracic (TTE) or transoesophageal cardiac ultrasound (TEE) was chosen following a decision tree. A resident internal medicine acted as contact person. Pre-intervention, 98 patients were eligible for analysis compared to 85 patients post-intervention. Age and number of risk factors were slightly higher post-intervention; other baseline characteristics were similar. Most SAB-patients were classified as complicated (89 and 82% pre- and post-intervention, respectively). Follow-up blood cultures drawn within 2 days after initiating treatment increased from 51 to 85%. Cardiac ultrasounds increased from 44 to 83% for TTE and 13 to 24% for TEE. Endocarditis was more frequently diagnosed (4 vs. 12%). Additionally, duration of antibiotic therapy increased. The 3-month mortality did not change significantly (33% pre-intervention vs. 35% post-intervention; p > 0.05). Introduction of a hospital-wide protocol for SAB management increased standard of care, created awareness among clinicians to properly classify SAB, search for endocarditis and adapt duration of antibiotic treatment. Mortality did not decrease.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 35 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 14%
Other 3 9%
Researcher 3 9%
Student > Postgraduate 3 9%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 10 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 29%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 6%
Unspecified 1 3%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 13 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 July 2018.
All research outputs
#19,388,465
of 23,856,830 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases
#2,245
of 2,863 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#260,656
of 334,460 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases
#28
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,856,830 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,863 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 334,460 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.