↓ Skip to main content

Benefits of All Work and No Play: The Relationship Between Neuroticism and Performance as a Function of Resource Allocation

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Applied Psychology, January 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
93 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
194 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Benefits of All Work and No Play: The Relationship Between Neuroticism and Performance as a Function of Resource Allocation
Published in
Journal of Applied Psychology, January 2006
DOI 10.1037/0021-9010.91.1.139
Pubmed ID
Authors

Luke D. Smillie, Gillian B. Yeo, Adrian F. Furnham, Chris J. Jackson

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 194 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 3%
Germany 3 2%
Australia 2 1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 178 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 39 20%
Student > Master 26 13%
Student > Bachelor 21 11%
Researcher 18 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 17 9%
Other 38 20%
Unknown 35 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 65 34%
Business, Management and Accounting 52 27%
Engineering 8 4%
Social Sciences 7 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4 2%
Other 17 9%
Unknown 41 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 February 2020.
All research outputs
#5,423,170
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Applied Psychology
#1,165
of 3,366 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,715
of 174,012 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Applied Psychology
#26
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,366 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 174,012 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.