↓ Skip to main content

Exploring tumourigenic potential of the parasite Anisakis: a pilot study

Overview of attention for article published in Parasitology Research, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
Title
Exploring tumourigenic potential of the parasite Anisakis: a pilot study
Published in
Parasitology Research, July 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00436-018-6008-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

María Teresa Corcuera, Cruz Rodríguez-Bobada, Jaime Zuloaga, Fernando Gómez-Aguado, Rosa Rodríguez-Perez, Ángel Mendizabal, Pablo González, Javier Arias-Díaz, María Luisa Caballero

Abstract

Anisakiasis is a global disease caused by consumption of raw or lightly cooked fish parasitised with Anisakis spp. third-stage larvae. Cases in the literature show colocalised anisakiasis and colorectal cancer, and the incidental finding of Anisakis larvae at the tumour site was reported. Data from our group suggested an epidemiological link between previous infection and gastrointestinal cancer. Furthermore, it has recently been reported that Anisakis products lead to inflammation and DNA damage. Based on these facts, the aim was to investigate whether Anisakis antigens are able to induce changes in the proliferation of epithelial cells in vitro or in the expression of serum microRNA (miRNA) in Sprague-Dawley rats. Anisakis complete extract (CE) induced increases in cell proliferation and decreases in apoptosis compared with nontreated cells, which resulted in a significant increase in the absolute number of viable cells at 48 h of exposure (P < .05). Furthermore, the miRNAs mmu-miR-1b-5p and mmu-miR-10b-5p (a cancer-related miRNA) were significantly decreased (P < .05) in sera from the rats inoculated with Anisakis CE, compared with control rats inoculated with saline. Additionally, based on their relative quantification values, four other cancer-related miRNAs were considered to be differently expressed, rno-miR-218a-5p and mmu-miR-224-5p (decreased) and rno-miR-125a-3p and rno-miR-200c-3p (increased). Anisakis CE was able to induce changes both in epithelial cells in vitro and in an animal model. The results obtained with Anisakis CE, in terms of increasing cell proliferation, decreasing apoptosis and inducing changes in the expression of serum cancer-related miRNAs in rats, suggest that Anisakis could have tumourigenic potential.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 29 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 14%
Librarian 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Professor 1 3%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 14 48%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 10%
Environmental Science 1 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Unspecified 1 3%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 16 55%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 July 2018.
All research outputs
#15,540,879
of 23,096,849 outputs
Outputs from Parasitology Research
#1,802
of 3,802 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#208,716
of 327,048 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Parasitology Research
#25
of 98 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,096,849 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,802 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,048 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 98 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.