↓ Skip to main content

The Clinical Features of Cerebrospinal Fluid Leaks - Based on Our Experiences

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of UOEH, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#38 of 200)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Clinical Features of Cerebrospinal Fluid Leaks - Based on Our Experiences
Published in
Journal of UOEH, September 2015
DOI 10.7888/juoeh.37.231
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tatsuya OHTONARI, Shinzo OTA, Yoshinobu SEKIHARA, Nobuharu NISHIHARA, Taisei OTA, Michiyoshi SATO, Akio TANAKA

Abstract

Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak, which usually occurs idiopathically or traumatically as a rare situation, is a rare disease that causes orthostatic headache or idiopathic chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH). We report our therapeutic experience of consecutive 20 cases for this disease, and review the current status and problems. Consecutive 20 patients (11 women; age 44.7 ± 12.1years) between April, 2006 and March, 2014, who were diagnosed by MRI and/or CT myelography (CTM), were evaluated retrospectively about clinical features. The main symptoms were as follows: orthostatic headache only; 10 cases, orthostatic headache with CSDH; 6, and none-orthostatic headache accompanied with CSDH; 4. As a treatment, direct surgeries were performed in 2 cases. Epidural blood patch (EBP) was applied in 14 cases (direct surgery was performed finally in the early one case), and widespread EBP with a single lumbar entry point utilizing an intravenous catheter was performed especially in the latest 9 cases. Another 5 cases were treated simply with the administration of a drip infusion regardless of the drainage for CSDH. Of 10 cases suffering from headache only, the headache disappeared completely or it was relieved in 9 cases. Of 10 cases accompanied with CSDH, recurrence of hematoma was prevented in all cases with a drip infusion after the drainage in one case and EBP after the drainage in another 9 cases. It was certified that we could diagnose CSF leak correctly with MRI and/or CTM and control this disorder almost completely with widespread EBP utilizing an intravenous catheter.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 6%
Unknown 15 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 25%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 13%
Student > Master 2 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 13%
Other 1 6%
Other 2 13%
Unknown 3 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 56%
Computer Science 1 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 6%
Unknown 5 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 October 2022.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of UOEH
#38
of 200 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#94,843
of 276,791 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of UOEH
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 200 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,791 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them