↓ Skip to main content

Wastewaters treatment containing phenol and ammonium using aerobic submerged membrane bioreactor

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Chemistry, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
Title
Wastewaters treatment containing phenol and ammonium using aerobic submerged membrane bioreactor
Published in
BMC Chemistry, July 2018
DOI 10.1186/s13065-018-0450-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mashallah Rezakazemi, Mohsen Maghami, Toraj Mohammadi

Abstract

Phenolic wastewater was treated using anaerobic submerged membrane bioreactor (ASMBR). Effect of different solids retention times on MBR performance was studied. Various ratios of carbon to nitrogen were used in the synthetic wastewaters. During the operation, phenol concentration of feed was changed from 100 to 1000 mg L-1. Phenol concentration was increased stepwise over the first 30 days and kept constant at 1000 mg L-1, thereafter. For the first 100 days, a chemical oxygen demand (COD) to N ratio of 100:5.0 was used and this resulted in phenol and COD removal more than 99 and 95%, respectively. However, the ammonium removal decreased from 95 to 40% by increasing the phenol concentration of feed, from 100 to 1000 mg L-1. For the last 25 days, a COD to N ratio of 100:2.1 was used due to the ammonium accumulation in the ASMBR. This led to the complete ammonium removal and no ammonium was detected in the ASMBR permeate. These results suggest that in the ASMBR at high phenol loading of 1000 mg L-1, COD to N ratio of the phenolic wastewater must be 100:2.1 for ammonium removal, while at low phenol loading, COD to N ratio of 100:5.0 can be used.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 31 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 23%
Student > Master 5 16%
Researcher 4 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Professor 1 3%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 9 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 6 19%
Environmental Science 4 13%
Chemical Engineering 3 10%
Chemistry 3 10%
Social Sciences 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 13 42%