↓ Skip to main content

Post-embolization neurological syndrome after embolization for intracranial and skull base tumors: transient exacerbation of neurological symptoms with inflammatory responses

Overview of attention for article published in Neuroradiology, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
Title
Post-embolization neurological syndrome after embolization for intracranial and skull base tumors: transient exacerbation of neurological symptoms with inflammatory responses
Published in
Neuroradiology, June 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00234-018-2047-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yujiro Tanaka, Takao Hashimoto, Daisuke Watanabe, Hirofumi Okada, Daichi Kato, Shigeru Aoyagi, Jiro Akimoto, Michihiro Kohno

Abstract

Pre-operative embolization is an effective treatment strategy for hypervascular intracranial and skull base tumors. However, neurological complications resulting from tumor swelling, cranial nerve ischemia, or hemorrhage can occur after embolization. The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between neurological complications following pre-operative embolization and minor adverse events including fever, headache, or increasing inflammation, which are common after embolization for abdominal tumors (i.e., post-embolization syndrome, PES). We retrospectively reviewed 39 consecutive patients with pre-operative embolization for intracranial and skull base tumors. Neurological symptoms and minor adverse events were regularly observed after embolization. The degree of devascularization was evaluated using enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. We also evaluated changes in peritumoral edema. Neurological complications occurred in eight cases, five of whom had exacerbation of existing neurological symptoms, which occurred concurrent with a general inflammatory response. We termed this clinical condition post-embolization neurological syndrome (PENS). The mean time to neurological symptom onset was 37.2 h after embolization. PENS was self-limiting in all cases but one, which required emergency surgery. The remaining three cases were diagnosed with cranial nerve ischemia. PENS is an important neurological complication after pre-operative embolization, which should be distinguished from ischemic or hemorrhagic complications. PES is a minor complication with favorable prognosis, whereas PENS should be considered as a dangerous clinical sign that may require emergency treatment. Further experiments are needed to elucidate the pathology of PENS.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 28 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 11%
Other 3 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Student > Bachelor 2 7%
Student > Master 2 7%
Other 5 18%
Unknown 11 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 7%
Neuroscience 2 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Decision Sciences 1 4%
Other 3 11%
Unknown 13 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 July 2018.
All research outputs
#20,527,576
of 23,096,849 outputs
Outputs from Neuroradiology
#1,094
of 1,407 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#287,423
of 328,121 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuroradiology
#15
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,096,849 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,407 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,121 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.