↓ Skip to main content

TNF-alpha G/A308 polymorphism association with nasal polyposis in North part of Iran

Overview of attention for article published in European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
Title
TNF-alpha G/A308 polymorphism association with nasal polyposis in North part of Iran
Published in
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, July 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00405-018-5059-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Masoumeh Faghani, Parvaneh Keshavars, Alireza Sharafshah, Babak Pourgholamali, Farshad Moharami, Shadman Nemati

Abstract

Nasal Polyposis (NP) is a complex multi-factorial disease; associated with several environmental, genetic and inflammatory factors. TNF-alpha is one of the major pro-inflammatory cytokines involved in NP pathogenesis. Some of the polymorphisms of this gene affect its expression. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the polymorphism of TNF-alpha G/A308 gene and its association with nasal polyposis in north part of Iran. In this case-control study, 60 patients with NP and 75 healthy individuals referred to Guilan University hospital were evaluated. After DNA extraction, RFLP-PCR was used to determine polymorphism. Chi-square test was used to compare the frequency distribution of genotype and alleles of TNF-alpha gene with NP. The frequency of genotype G/G, A/A and G/A in the NP group was 46.7, 10.0 and 43.3%, and in the control group was 65.3, 5.3 and 29.3%, respectively. There was a statistically significant difference between genotype G/G in two groups (P = 0.006, OR 2.58, CI 1.27-5.23). In addition, the frequency of allele A in patients and controls was 31.7 and 20%, respectively; and this difference was statistically significant (p = 0.02). The findings of this study demonstrated that polymorphism in TNF-alpha gene might be a risk factor for NP in north part of Iran and the minor frequency of G308A allele in the current study is slightly more than other major populations. However, more investigations with high number of population are necessary in future.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 14 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 29%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 14%
Lecturer 1 7%
Student > Master 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Unknown 3 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 36%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 21%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 7%
Engineering 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 July 2018.
All research outputs
#18,643,992
of 23,096,849 outputs
Outputs from European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology
#1,673
of 3,122 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#252,360
of 326,948 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology
#19
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,096,849 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,122 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,948 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.