↓ Skip to main content

NF-κB signaling in cancer stem cells: a promising therapeutic target?

Overview of attention for article published in Cellular Oncology, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
79 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
70 Mendeley
Title
NF-κB signaling in cancer stem cells: a promising therapeutic target?
Published in
Cellular Oncology, August 2015
DOI 10.1007/s13402-015-0236-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

K. Vazquez-Santillan, J. Melendez-Zajgla, L. Jimenez-Hernandez, G. Martínez-Ruiz, V. Maldonado

Abstract

Cancer stem cells (CSCs) are regulated by several signaling pathways that ultimately control their maintenance and expansion. NF-κB (nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells) forms a protein complex that controls DNA transcription and, as such, plays an important role in proliferation, inflammation, angiogenesis, invasion and metastasis. The NF-κB signaling pathway, which has been found to be constitutively activated in CSCs from a variety of cancers, participates in the maintenance, expansion, proliferation and survival of CSCs. Targeted disruption of this pathway may profoundly impair the adverse phenotype of CSCs and may provide a therapeutic opportunity to remove the CSC fraction. In particular, it may be attractive to use specific NF-κB inhibitors in chronic therapeutic schemes to reduce disease progression. Exceptional low toxicity profiles of these inhibitors are a prerequisite for use in combined treatment regimens and to avoid resistance. Although still preliminary, recent evidence shows that such targeted strategies may be useful in adjuvant chemo-preventive settings.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 70 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 19%
Student > Bachelor 11 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 14%
Student > Master 7 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 7%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 18 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 22 31%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 19 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 May 2018.
All research outputs
#16,291,311
of 23,999,200 outputs
Outputs from Cellular Oncology
#181
of 426 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#160,548
of 270,337 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cellular Oncology
#4
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,999,200 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 426 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 270,337 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.