↓ Skip to main content

Muscle health and performance in monozygotic twins with 30 years of discordant exercise habits

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Applied Physiology, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#23 of 4,395)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
9 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
365 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
167 Mendeley
Title
Muscle health and performance in monozygotic twins with 30 years of discordant exercise habits
Published in
European Journal of Applied Physiology, July 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00421-018-3943-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Katherine E. Bathgate, James R. Bagley, Edward Jo, Robert J. Talmadge, Irene S. Tobias, Lee E. Brown, Jared W. Coburn, Jose A. Arevalo, Nancy L. Segal, Andrew J. Galpin

Abstract

Physical health and function depend upon both genetic inheritance and environmental factors (e.g., exercise training). To enhance the understanding of heritability/adaptability, we explored the skeletal muscle health and physiological performance of monozygotic (MZ) twins with > 30 years of chronic endurance training vs. no specific/consistent exercise. One pair of male MZ twins (age = 52 years; Trained Twin, TT; Untrained Twin, UT) underwent analyses of: (1) anthropometric characteristics and blood profiles, (2) markers of cardiovascular and pulmonary health, and (3) skeletal muscle size, strength, and power and molecular markers of muscle health. This case study represents the most comprehensive physiological comparison of MZ twins with this length and magnitude of differing exercise history. TT exhibited: (1) lower body mass, body fat%, resting heart rate, blood pressure, cholesterol, triglycerides, and plasma glucose, (2) greater relative cycling power, anaerobic endurance, and aerobic capacity (VO2max), but lower muscle size/strength and poorer muscle quality, (3) more MHC I (slow-twitch) and fewer MHC IIa (fast-twitch) fibers, (4) greater AMPK protein expression, and (5) greater PAX7, IGF1Ec, IGF1Ea, and FN14 mRNA expression than UT. Several measured differences are the largest reported between MZ twins (TT expressed 55% more MHC I fibers, 12.4 ml/kg/min greater VO2max, and 8.6% lower body fat% vs. UT). These data collectively (a) support utilizing chronic endurance training to improve body composition and cardiovascular health and (b) suggest the cardiovascular and skeletal muscle systems exhibit greater plasticity than previously thought, further highlighting the importance of studying MZ twins with large (long-term) differences in exposomes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 365 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 167 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 167 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 25 15%
Student > Master 23 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 11%
Researcher 11 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 6%
Other 26 16%
Unknown 53 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 48 29%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 17 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 3%
Other 25 15%
Unknown 57 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 305. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 November 2023.
All research outputs
#115,303
of 25,793,330 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#23
of 4,395 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,393
of 341,301 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#1
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,793,330 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,395 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,301 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.