↓ Skip to main content

Interactions among myeloid regulatory cells in cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
44 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
84 Mendeley
Title
Interactions among myeloid regulatory cells in cancer
Published in
Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy, July 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00262-018-2200-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Viktor Umansky, Gosse J. Adema, Jaroslaw Baran, Sven Brandau, Jo A. Van Ginderachter, Xiaoying Hu, Jadwiga Jablonska, Slavko Mojsilovic, Helen A. Papadaki, Yago Pico de Coaña, Kim C. M. Santegoets, Juan F. Santibanez, Karine Serre, Yu Si, Isabela Sieminska, Maria Velegraki, Zvi G. Fridlender

Abstract

Mounting evidence has accumulated on the critical role of the different myeloid cells in the regulation of the cancerous process, and in particular in the modulation of the immune reaction to cancer. Myeloid cells are a major component of host cells infiltrating tumors, interacting with each other, with tumor cells and other stromal cells, and demonstrating a prominent plasticity. We describe here various myeloid regulatory cells (MRCs) in mice and human as well as their relevant therapeutic targets. We first address the role of the monocytes and macrophages that can contribute to angiogenesis, immunosuppression and metastatic dissemination. Next, we discuss the differential role of neutrophil subsets in tumor development, enhancing the dual and sometimes contradicting role of these cells. A heterogeneous population of immature myeloid cells, MDSCs, was shown to be generated and accumulated during tumor progression as well as to be an important player in cancer-related immune suppression. Lastly, we discuss the role of myeloid DCs, which can either contribute to effective anti-tumor responses or play a more regulatory role. We believe that MRCs play a critical role in cancer-related immune regulation and suggest that future anti-cancer therapies will focus on these abundant cells.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 84 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 21%
Researcher 15 18%
Student > Master 9 11%
Student > Bachelor 5 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Other 13 15%
Unknown 19 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Immunology and Microbiology 15 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 4%
Other 6 7%
Unknown 26 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 July 2018.
All research outputs
#14,718,998
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy
#2,049
of 2,948 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#186,868
of 327,874 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy
#29
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,948 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,874 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.