↓ Skip to main content

Genetics of and pathogenic mechanisms in arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy

Overview of attention for article published in Biophysical Reviews, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
68 Mendeley
Title
Genetics of and pathogenic mechanisms in arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy
Published in
Biophysical Reviews, July 2018
DOI 10.1007/s12551-018-0437-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anita Kiran Vimalanathan, Elisabeth Ehler, Katja Gehmlich

Abstract

Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) is an inherited heart disease, associated with a high risk of sudden cardiac death. ARVC has been termed a 'disease of the desmosome' based on the fact that in many cases, it is caused by mutations in genes encoding desmosomal proteins at the specialised intercellular junctions between cardiomyocytes, the intercalated discs. Desmosomes maintain the structural integrity of the ventricular myocardium and are also implicated in signal transduction pathways. Mutated desmosomal proteins are thought to cause detachment of cardiac myocytes by the loss of cellular adhesions and also affect signalling pathways, leading to cell death and substitution by fibrofatty adipocytic tissue. However, mutations in desmosomal proteins are not the sole cause for ARVC as mutations in non-desmosomal genes were also implicated in its pathogenesis. This review will consider the pathology, genetic basis and mechanisms of pathogenesis for ARVC.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 68 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 9 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 12%
Student > Master 6 9%
Student > Bachelor 5 7%
Student > Postgraduate 5 7%
Other 12 18%
Unknown 23 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 25%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 6%
Engineering 3 4%
Neuroscience 3 4%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 25 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 July 2018.
All research outputs
#18,643,992
of 23,096,849 outputs
Outputs from Biophysical Reviews
#496
of 799 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#252,271
of 326,767 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biophysical Reviews
#8
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,096,849 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 799 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,767 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.