| Title |
Endometrial Cancer MRI staging: Updated Guidelines of the European Society of Urogenital Radiology
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Radiology, July 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00330-018-5515-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Stephanie Nougaret, Mariana Horta, Evis Sala, Yulia Lakhman, Isabelle Thomassin-Naggara, Aki Kido, Gabriele Masselli, Nishat Bharwani, Elizabeth Sadowski, Andrea Ertmer, Milagros Otero-Garcia, Rahel A. Kubik-Huch, Teresa M Cunha, Andrea Rockall, Rosemarie Forstner |
| Abstract |
To update the 2009 ESUR endometrial cancer guidelines and propose strategies to standardize image acquisition, interpretation and reporting for endometrial cancer staging with MRI. The published evidence-based data and the opinion of experts were combined using the RAND-UCLA Appropriateness Method and formed the basis for these consensus guidelines. The responses of the experts to 81 questions regarding the details of patient preparation, MR imaging protocol, image interpretation and reporting were collected, analysed and classified as "RECOMMENDED" versus "NOT RECOMMENDED" (if at least 80% consensus among experts) or uncertain (if less than 80% consensus among experts). Consensus regarding patient preparation, MR image acquisition, interpretation and reporting was determined using the RAND-UCLA Appropriateness Method. A tailored MR imaging protocol and a standardized report were recommended. These consensus recommendations should be used as a guide for endometrial cancer staging with MRI. • MRI is recommended for initial staging of endometrial cancer. • MR imaging protocol should be tailored based on the risk of lymph node metastases. • Myometrial invasion is best assessed using combined axial-oblique T2WI, DWI and contrast-enhanced imaging. • The mnemonic "Clinical and MRI Critical TEAM" summarizes key elements of the standardized report. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 21% |
| Austria | 2 | 14% |
| Spain | 2 | 14% |
| Italy | 1 | 7% |
| Philippines | 1 | 7% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 7% |
| Hungary | 1 | 7% |
| Dominican Republic | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 2 | 14% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 57% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 29% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 186 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 186 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 22 | 12% |
| Researcher | 22 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 22 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 15 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 6% |
| Other | 36 | 19% |
| Unknown | 58 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 94 | 51% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 2% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 2% |
| Engineering | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 13 | 7% |
| Unknown | 64 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 October 2022.
All research outputs
#2,622,851
of 24,652,007 outputs
Outputs from European Radiology
#246
of 4,684 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,130
of 331,516 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Radiology
#10
of 96 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,652,007 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,684 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,516 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 96 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.