| Title |
Automated classification of brain images using wavelet-energy and biogeography-based optimization
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Multimedia Tools and Applications, May 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11042-015-2649-7 |
| Authors |
Gelan Yang, Yudong Zhang, Jiquan Yang, Genlin Ji, Zhengchao Dong, Shuihua Wang, Chunmei Feng, Qiong Wang |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 54 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 11 | 20% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 9% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 7% |
| Lecturer | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 10 | 19% |
| Unknown | 17 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 19 | 35% |
| Engineering | 9 | 17% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Unknown | 19 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 September 2015.
All research outputs
#7,942,395
of 23,906,448 outputs
Outputs from Multimedia Tools and Applications
#316
of 4,321 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#92,972
of 267,292 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Multimedia Tools and Applications
#2
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,906,448 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,321 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,292 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.