↓ Skip to main content

Photodynamic and photobiological effects of light-emitting diode (LED) therapy in dermatological disease: an update

Overview of attention for article published in Lasers in Medical Science, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#40 of 1,416)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
6 X users
video
4 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
80 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
151 Mendeley
Title
Photodynamic and photobiological effects of light-emitting diode (LED) therapy in dermatological disease: an update
Published in
Lasers in Medical Science, July 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10103-018-2584-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elisabetta Sorbellini, Mariangela Rucco, Fabio Rinaldi

Abstract

Benefit deriving from the use of light is known since ancient time, but, only in the last decades of twentieth century, we witnessed the rapid expansion of knowledge and techniques. Light-emitted diode (LED)-based devices represent the emerging and safest tool for the treatment of many conditions such as skin inflammatory conditions, aging, and disorders linked to hair growth. The present work reviews the current knowledge about LED-based therapeutic approaches in different skin and hair disorders. LED therapy represents the emerging and safest tool for the treatment of many conditions such as skin inflammatory conditions, aging, and disorders linked to hair growth. The use of LED in the treatment of such conditions has now entered common practice among dermatologists. Additional controlled studies are still needed to corroborate the efficacy of such kind of treatment.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 151 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 151 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 11%
Researcher 14 9%
Student > Bachelor 14 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 7%
Other 27 18%
Unknown 57 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 8%
Engineering 11 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 4%
Chemistry 5 3%
Other 24 16%
Unknown 65 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 April 2024.
All research outputs
#2,301,254
of 25,657,205 outputs
Outputs from Lasers in Medical Science
#40
of 1,416 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,486
of 340,907 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lasers in Medical Science
#2
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,657,205 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,416 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,907 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.