| Title |
Combining genetic non-invasive sampling with spatially explicit capture-recapture models for density estimation of a patchily distributed small mammal
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Journal of Wildlife Research, July 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10344-018-1206-x |
| Authors |
Helena Sabino-Marques, Clara Mendes Ferreira, Joana Paupério, Pedro Costa, Soraia Barbosa, Cláudia Encarnação, Russell Alpizar-Jara, Paulo Célio Alves, Jeremy B. Searle, António Mira, Pedro Beja, Ricardo Pita |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 59 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 12 | 20% |
| Researcher | 12 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 15% |
| Professor | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 8% |
| Other | 9 | 15% |
| Unknown | 7 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 27 | 46% |
| Environmental Science | 13 | 22% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 12% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 3% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Unknown | 5 | 8% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 August 2018.
All research outputs
#18,643,992
of 23,096,849 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Wildlife Research
#695
of 917 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#252,448
of 327,054 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Wildlife Research
#13
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,096,849 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 917 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,054 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.