↓ Skip to main content

Woody-tissue respiration for Simarouba amara and Minquartia guianensis, two tropical wet forest trees with different growth habits

Overview of attention for article published in Oecologia, December 1994
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
87 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
93 Mendeley
Title
Woody-tissue respiration for Simarouba amara and Minquartia guianensis, two tropical wet forest trees with different growth habits
Published in
Oecologia, December 1994
DOI 10.1007/bf00316947
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael G. Ryan, Robert M. Hubbard, Deborah A. Clark, Robert L. Sanford

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Brazil 2 2%
Vietnam 1 1%
Australia 1 1%
Peru 1 1%
Costa Rica 1 1%
Unknown 85 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 22 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 19%
Student > Master 11 12%
Professor 8 9%
Student > Bachelor 5 5%
Other 18 19%
Unknown 11 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 38 41%
Environmental Science 28 30%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 1%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 1%
Other 3 3%
Unknown 18 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 January 2021.
All research outputs
#8,882,501
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Oecologia
#2,058
of 4,909 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,555
of 77,559 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oecologia
#8
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,909 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 77,559 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.