↓ Skip to main content

Gene Expression of ABHD6, a Key Factor in the Endocannabinoid System, Can Be Modulated by Female Hormones in Human Immune Cells

Overview of attention for article published in Biochemical Genetics, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
Title
Gene Expression of ABHD6, a Key Factor in the Endocannabinoid System, Can Be Modulated by Female Hormones in Human Immune Cells
Published in
Biochemical Genetics, July 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10528-018-9871-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Manuela Nunes Drehmer, Yara Costa Netto Muniz, Andrea Rita Marrero, Sara Emelie Löfgren

Abstract

One of the main risk factors for the development of an autoimmune disease is to be a woman. Much attention has been given to the involvement of female hormones in their etiology and sexual bias, although the mechanisms behind this potentially strong contribution in disease susceptibility are poorly understood. ABHD6 gene was recently identified as a risk factor for system lupus erythematosus and the risk was correlated with overexpression of the gene. ABHD6 is an enzyme that degrades the 2-arachidonoylglycerol, an endocannabinoid with immunomodulatory effects. Thus its degradation could contribute to immune dysregulation and development of autoimmune reactions. Sex hormones, such as estrogens, are believed to regulate important genes in the endocannabinoid pathway. However, no study was available regarding the effect of these hormones in human immune cells. In this study, ABHD6 expression was evaluated by quantitative PCR in leukocytes from healthy male and females and in the presence of estrogen or progesterone (PG). A statistical increase in ABHD6 expression could be detected in women. In the presence of estrogen or PG, a statistical upregulation of ABHD6 was observed, and in a sex-dependent manner, as only female cells responded to stimulation. Our results suggest that female hormones can promote the overexpression of ABHD6 in immune cells. This can potentially contribute to a pro-inflammatory scenario and partially explain the association of this gene in the development of LES, a highly female-biased disease.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 25%
Other 3 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 13%
Student > Bachelor 2 8%
Professor 2 8%
Other 4 17%
Unknown 4 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 13%
Chemistry 3 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Other 4 17%
Unknown 7 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 July 2018.
All research outputs
#20,527,576
of 23,096,849 outputs
Outputs from Biochemical Genetics
#370
of 482 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#286,411
of 327,048 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biochemical Genetics
#9
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,096,849 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 482 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,048 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.