↓ Skip to main content

Saisonale Verteilung chirurgischer Krankheitsbilder

Overview of attention for article published in Die Chirurgie, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
Title
Saisonale Verteilung chirurgischer Krankheitsbilder
Published in
Die Chirurgie, July 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00104-018-0685-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

N. Eisenberg, I. Gockel, N. von Dercks

Abstract

The registration of diagnoses and diagnose-related groups (DRG) allows conclusions to be drawn about the distribution over the course of the year. Seasonal variations can be recognized and used to plan further resource management. From 2006 to 2016 a total of 30,999 main diagnoses and DRGs were registered at the hospital for visceral surgery of the University Medical Hospital in Leipzig. The data were sorted on a monthly and seasonal basis and compared to meteorological data received from the German Meteorological Service. Furthermore, epidemiological information about the patients was recorded. The most frequently registered main diagnosis was malignant neoplasms of the liver and intrahepatic bile ducts with 1589 cases (C22), followed by acute appendicitis with 1557 cases (K35). There was a significant seasonal and monthly variation for cholelithiasis (K80) with 1013 cases (p = 0.002++), inguinal hernia (K40), 887 cases (p = 0.002++), ventral hernia (K43), 696 cases (p < 0.001++) and varices of the lower limbs (I83), 352 cases (p < 0.001++). A similar correlation could be shown for daily sunshine hours and case numbers for patients with the main diagnosis groups I83 (r = -0.12, p = 0.036+) and K43 (r = -0.08, p = 0.041+). Another significant correlation was observed between patients' epidemiological information and medical data: patient-related clinical severity (PCCL) ~ age (r = 0.27, p < 0.001++), length of hospital stay ~ age (r = 0.25, p < 0.001++), duration of ventilation ~ age (r = 0.07, p < 0.001++) and mortality ~ age (r = 0.09, p < 0.001++). A seasonal variation in case numbers for individual main diagnoses could be registered and elective and therefore plannable surgeries were mostly affected. An adequate resource management can reveal economic benefits. Older patients consume a high amount of resources and should be given a higher priority.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 2 18%
Researcher 2 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 9%
Student > Bachelor 1 9%
Student > Master 1 9%
Other 3 27%
Unknown 1 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 55%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 9%
Unknown 3 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 July 2018.
All research outputs
#20,663,600
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Die Chirurgie
#252
of 434 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#264,849
of 340,113 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Die Chirurgie
#3
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 434 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,113 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.