↓ Skip to main content

An integrative network-based approach to identify novel disease genes and pathways: a case study in the context of inflammatory bowel disease

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Bioinformatics, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
61 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
An integrative network-based approach to identify novel disease genes and pathways: a case study in the context of inflammatory bowel disease
Published in
BMC Bioinformatics, July 2018
DOI 10.1186/s12859-018-2251-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ryohei Eguchi, Mohammand Bozlul Karim, Pingzhao Hu, Tetsuo Sato, Naoaki Ono, Shigehiko Kanaya, Md. Altaf-Ul-Amin

Abstract

There are different and complicated associations between genes and diseases. Finding the causal associations between genes and specific diseases is still challenging. In this work we present a method to predict novel associations of genes and pathways with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) by integrating information of differential gene expression, protein-protein interaction and known disease genes related to IBD. We downloaded IBD gene expression data from NCBI's Gene Expression Omnibus, performed statistical analysis to determine differentially expressed genes, collected known IBD genes from DisGeNet database, which were used to construct a IBD related PPI network with HIPPIE database. We adapted our graph-based clustering algorithm DPClusO to cluster the disease PPI network. We evaluated the statistical significance of the identified clusters in the context of determining the richness of IBD genes using Fisher's exact test and predicted novel genes related to IBD. We showed 93.8% of our predictions are correct in the context of other databases and published literatures related to IBD. Finding disease-causing genes is necessary for developing drugs with synergistic effect targeting many genes simultaneously. Here we present an approach to identify novel disease genes and pathways and discuss our approach in the context of IBD. The approach can be generalized to find disease-associated genes for other diseases.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 61 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 16%
Student > Master 7 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Student > Postgraduate 3 5%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 21 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 11%
Computer Science 4 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 24 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 July 2018.
All research outputs
#12,808,677
of 23,096,849 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#3,626
of 7,328 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#152,193
of 327,048 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#41
of 106 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,096,849 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,328 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,048 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 106 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.