↓ Skip to main content

Reproductive healthcare utilization in urban poor settlements of Delhi: Baseline survey of ANCHUL (Ante Natal and Child Health care in Urban Slums) project

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
185 Mendeley
Title
Reproductive healthcare utilization in urban poor settlements of Delhi: Baseline survey of ANCHUL (Ante Natal and Child Health care in Urban Slums) project
Published in
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, September 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12884-015-0635-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Niveditha Devasenapathy, Suparna Ghosh Jerath, Elizebeth Allen, Saket Sharma, Anuraj H. Shankar, Sanjay Zodpey

Abstract

Disparity in utilization of reproductive healthcare services between the urban poor and the urban non-poor households in the developing nations is well known. However, disparity may also exist within urban poor households. Our objective was to document the extent of disparity in reproductive healthcare utilization among the urban poor and to identify the socio-demographic determinants of underutilization with a view to characterizing this vulnerable subpopulation. A survey of 16,221 households was conducted in 39 clusters from two large urban poor settlements in Delhi. From 13,451 consenting households, socio-demographic data and information on births, maternal and child deaths within the previous year was collected. Details of antenatal care (ANC) was collected from 597 pregnant women. Information on ANC and postnatal care was also obtained from 596 recently delivered (within six months) mothers. All data were captured electronically using a customized and validated smart phone application. Households were categorized into quintiles of socio-economic position (SEP) based on dwelling characteristics and possession of durable assets using principal component analysis. Potential socio-demographic determinants of reproductive healthcare utilization were examined using random effects logistic regression. The prevalence of facility based birthing was 77 % (n = 596 mothers). Of the 596 recently delivered mothers only 70 % had an ANC registration card, 46.3 % had ANC in their first trimester, 46 % had visited a facility within 4 weeks post-delivery and 27 % were using modern contraceptive methods. Low socio-economic position was the most important predictor of underutilization with a clear gradient across SEP quintiles. Compared to the poorest, the least poor women were more likely to be registered for ANC (OR 1.96, 95 %CI 0.95-4.15) and more likely to have made ≥ 4 ANC visits (OR 5.86, 95 %CI 2.82-12.19). They were more likely to have given birth in a facility (OR 4.87, 95 %CI 2.12-11.16), to have visited a hospital within one month of childbirth (OR 3.18, 95 %CI 1.62-6.26). In general, government funded health insurance and conditional cash transfers schemes were underutilized in this community. The poorest segment of the urban poor population utilizes reproductive healthcare facilities the least. Strategies to improve access and utilization of healthcare services among the poorest of the poor may be necessary to achieve universal health coverage.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 185 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 184 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 32 17%
Researcher 26 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 12%
Student > Bachelor 18 10%
Other 10 5%
Other 29 16%
Unknown 47 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 38 21%
Social Sciences 30 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 28 15%
Business, Management and Accounting 5 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 3%
Other 21 11%
Unknown 58 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 September 2015.
All research outputs
#15,346,908
of 22,828,180 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#2,998
of 4,191 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#156,745
of 267,498 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#75
of 107 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,828,180 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,191 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,498 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 107 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.