| Title |
Single‐ versus Double‐bundle ACL Reconstruction: Is There Any Difference in Stability and Function at 3‐year Followup?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, March 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11999-011-1940-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Alberto Gobbi, Vivek Mahajan, Georgios Karnatzikos, Norimasa Nakamura |
| Abstract |
Despite a number of studies comparing postoperative stability and function after anatomic double-bundle and single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), it remains unclear whether double-bundle reconstruction improves stability or function. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 152 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 148 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 22 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 11% |
| Researcher | 15 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 15 | 10% |
| Other | 9 | 6% |
| Other | 29 | 19% |
| Unknown | 45 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 69 | 45% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 9% |
| Sports and Recreations | 11 | 7% |
| Engineering | 2 | 1% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 5 | 3% |
| Unknown | 50 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 May 2016.
All research outputs
#19,942,887
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#5,962
of 7,298 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#128,181
of 168,139 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#56
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,298 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,139 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.