↓ Skip to main content

Peripheral DXA measurement around ankle joint to diagnose osteoporosis as assessed by central DXA measurement

Overview of attention for article published in Skeletal Radiology, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
Title
Peripheral DXA measurement around ankle joint to diagnose osteoporosis as assessed by central DXA measurement
Published in
Skeletal Radiology, February 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00256-018-2876-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ki Hyuk Sung, Young Choi, Gyeong Hee Cho, Chin Youb Chung, Moon Seok Park, Kyoung Min Lee

Abstract

This study evaluated the correlation between central and peripheral bone mineral density (BMD) of the ankle joint, using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). We also investigated whether peripheral ankle BMD could be used to identify individuals who were diagnosed with osteoporosis, using central DXA. We recruited 134 volunteers aged 20-90 years who agreed to participate in this study. Central BMD of the lumbar spine and left femur, and peripheral BMD of the medial malleolus, distal tibia, lateral malleolus, and talus were measured with DXA. Among the peripheral sites of the ankle, the highest and lowest BMD were observed in the talus and lateral malleolus, respectively. All peripheral DXA measurements of the ankle joint were significantly correlated with central DXA measurements. There was a good correlation (r: 0.656-0.725) between peripheral and central BMD for the older age group (> 50 years), but fair-to-good correlation (r: 0.263-0.654) for the younger age group (< 50 years). The cut-off values for peripheral BMD of the ankle joint between osteoporosis and non-osteoporosis were 0.548 g/cm2 (sensitivity, 89.0%; specificity, 69.0%) for the medial malleolus, 0.626 g/cm2 (sensitivity, 83.3%; specificity, 82.8%) for the distal tibia, 0.47 g/cm2 (sensitivity, 100.0%; specificity, 65.5%) for the lateral malleolus, and 0.973 g/cm2 (sensitivity, 72.2%; specificity, 83.6%) for the talus (p < 0.001). This study showed good correlation between peripheral BMD around ankle joint and central BMD for older age group. Further study is required to use the ankle DXA as a valid clinical tool for the diagnosis of osteoporosis and fracture risk assessment.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 15 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 7%
Student > Bachelor 1 7%
Professor 1 7%
Other 3 20%
Unknown 7 47%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 7%
Unspecified 1 7%
Computer Science 1 7%
Engineering 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 7 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 August 2022.
All research outputs
#7,029,690
of 23,006,268 outputs
Outputs from Skeletal Radiology
#393
of 1,477 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#143,773
of 437,236 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Skeletal Radiology
#10
of 68 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,006,268 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,477 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,236 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 68 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.