| Title |
A systematic review of intravenous ketamine for postoperative analgesia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie, July 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12630-011-9560-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kevin Laskowski, Alena Stirling, William P. McKay, Hyun J. Lim |
| Abstract |
Perioperative intravenous ketamine may be a useful addition in pain management regimens. Previous systematic reviews have included all methods of ketamine administration, and heterogeneity between studies has been substantial. This study addresses this issue by narrowing the inclusion criteria, using a random effects model, and performing subgroup analysis to determine the specific types of patients, surgery, and clinical indications which may benefit from perioperative ketamine administration. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 3 | 16% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 11% |
| United States | 1 | 5% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 5% |
| Brazil | 1 | 5% |
| Singapore | 1 | 5% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 9 | 47% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 63% |
| Scientists | 3 | 16% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 11% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 400 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 395 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 49 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 49 | 12% |
| Researcher | 42 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 42 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 39 | 10% |
| Other | 100 | 25% |
| Unknown | 79 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 236 | 59% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 17 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 9 | 2% |
| Psychology | 5 | 1% |
| Other | 31 | 8% |
| Unknown | 86 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 April 2024.
All research outputs
#1,913,854
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie
#244
of 2,901 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,548
of 131,007 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie
#1
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,901 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 131,007 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.