↓ Skip to main content

Removing pathogenic memories

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular Neurobiology, January 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
49 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
Title
Removing pathogenic memories
Published in
Molecular Neurobiology, January 2005
DOI 10.1385/mn:32:2:123
Pubmed ID
Authors

Diego Centonze, Alberto Siracusano, Paolo Calabresi, Giorgio Bernardi

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 42 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 27%
Student > Bachelor 7 16%
Student > Master 5 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Researcher 3 7%
Other 10 23%
Unknown 4 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 14 32%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 20%
Neuroscience 6 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 5%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 7 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 September 2016.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Neurobiology
#1,608
of 3,959 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,859
of 151,221 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Neurobiology
#3
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,959 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 151,221 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.