↓ Skip to main content

Interstitial Cystitis and Sexual Dysfunction: Diagnostic Accuracy Is Essential

Overview of attention for article published in Current Sexual Health Reports, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
Title
Interstitial Cystitis and Sexual Dysfunction: Diagnostic Accuracy Is Essential
Published in
Current Sexual Health Reports, July 2018
DOI 10.1007/s11930-018-0162-5
Authors

Rachel S. Rubin, Elizabeth Malphrus

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 67%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 67%
Psychology 1 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 September 2018.
All research outputs
#6,329,134
of 23,096,849 outputs
Outputs from Current Sexual Health Reports
#75
of 209 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#109,151
of 326,948 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Sexual Health Reports
#8
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,096,849 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 209 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,948 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.