↓ Skip to main content

A comprehensive study of pseudo-tested methods

Overview of attention for article published in Empirical Software Engineering, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
Title
A comprehensive study of pseudo-tested methods
Published in
Empirical Software Engineering, September 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10664-018-9653-2
Authors

Oscar Luis Vera-Pérez, Benjamin Danglot, Martin Monperrus, Benoit Baudry

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 26 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 3 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 12%
Researcher 3 12%
Student > Master 3 12%
Student > Postgraduate 2 8%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 10 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 13 50%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 4%
Chemical Engineering 1 4%
Sports and Recreations 1 4%
Unknown 10 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 March 2021.
All research outputs
#3,466,304
of 24,780,938 outputs
Outputs from Empirical Software Engineering
#71
of 756 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,687
of 347,248 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Empirical Software Engineering
#4
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,780,938 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 756 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 347,248 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.