↓ Skip to main content

Revisiting learning communities: innovations in theory and practice

Overview of attention for article published in Instructional Science, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
65 Mendeley
Title
Revisiting learning communities: innovations in theory and practice
Published in
Instructional Science, July 2018
DOI 10.1007/s11251-018-9467-z
Authors

Yotam Hod, Katerine Bielaczyc, Dani Ben-Zvi

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 65 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 18%
Student > Master 9 14%
Researcher 8 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 8%
Other 14 22%
Unknown 11 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 23 35%
Computer Science 5 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 6%
Psychology 4 6%
Mathematics 4 6%
Other 11 17%
Unknown 14 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 July 2018.
All research outputs
#8,037,303
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Instructional Science
#159
of 506 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#125,430
of 342,589 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Instructional Science
#5
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 506 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,589 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.