↓ Skip to main content

Pharmacokinetics of the Dietary Supplement Creatine

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Pharmacokinetics, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#50 of 1,602)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
10 X users
patent
2 patents
video
3 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
92 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
169 Mendeley
Title
Pharmacokinetics of the Dietary Supplement Creatine
Published in
Clinical Pharmacokinetics, September 2012
DOI 10.2165/00003088-200342060-00005
Pubmed ID
Authors

Adam M. Persky, Gayle A. Brazeau, Günther Hochhaus

Abstract

Creatine is a nonessential dietary component that, when supplemented in the diet, has shown physiological benefits in athletes, in animal-based models of disease and in patients with various muscle, neurological and neuromuscular disease. The clinical relevance of creatine supplementation is based primarily on its role in ATP generation, and cells may be able to better handle rapidly changing energy demands with supplementation. Although the pharmacological outcome measures of creatine have been investigated, the behaviour of creatine in the blood and muscle is still not fully understood. Creatine is most probably actively absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract in a similar way to amino acids and peptides. The distribution of creatine throughout the body is largely determined by the presence of creatine transporters. These transporters not only serve to distribute creatine but serve as a clearance mechanism because of creatine 'trapping' by skeletal muscle. Besides the pseudo-irreversible uptake by skeletal muscle, creatine clearance also depends on renal elimination and degradation to creatinine. Evidence suggests that creatine pharmacokinetics are nonlinear with respect to dose size and frequency. Skeletal muscle, the largest depot of creatine, has a finite capacity to store creatine. As such, when these stores are saturated, both volume of distribution and clearance can decrease, thus leading to complex pharmacokinetic situations. Additionally, other dietary components such as caffeine and carbohydrate can potentially affect pharmacokinetics by their influence on the creatine transporter. Disease and age may also affect the pharmacokinetics, but more information is needed. Overall, there are very limited pharmacokinetic data available for creatine, and further studies are needed to define absorption characteristics, clearance kinetics and the effect of multiple doses. Additionally, the relationship between plasma creatine and muscle creatine needs to be elucidated to optimise administration regimens.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 169 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 1%
Slovenia 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 165 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 26 15%
Student > Master 23 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 12%
Researcher 10 6%
Student > Postgraduate 10 6%
Other 34 20%
Unknown 45 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 17%
Sports and Recreations 26 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 25 15%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 9 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 5%
Other 24 14%
Unknown 49 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 January 2024.
All research outputs
#1,664,302
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Pharmacokinetics
#50
of 1,602 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,682
of 191,405 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Pharmacokinetics
#15
of 587 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,602 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 191,405 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 587 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.