↓ Skip to main content

Amateur photographic practice, collective representation and the constitution of place

Overview of attention for article published in Visual Studies, June 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
55 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
88 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Amateur photographic practice, collective representation and the constitution of place
Published in
Visual Studies, June 2011
DOI 10.1080/1472586x.2011.571884
Authors

Sarah Pink

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
United Kingdom 2 2%
Italy 1 1%
Australia 1 1%
Slovenia 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 80 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 38%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 13%
Student > Master 9 10%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 7 8%
Researcher 6 7%
Other 21 24%
Unknown 1 1%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 49 56%
Arts and Humanities 22 25%
Computer Science 5 6%
Psychology 4 5%
Design 2 2%
Other 3 3%
Unknown 3 3%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 September 2011.
All research outputs
#15,238,442
of 22,656,971 outputs
Outputs from Visual Studies
#182
of 310 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,468
of 111,174 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Visual Studies
#3
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,656,971 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 310 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 111,174 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.